All people
Indexing & Passive Investing

Burton Malkiel

Economist and author of A Random Walk Down Wall Street

Born 1932

Argued that share prices are difficult to predict and that most investors are better served by low-cost diversified funds.

Biography

Burton Malkiel is an American economist, born in 1932, whose 1973 book A Random Walk Down Wall Street did more than any academic paper to bring the case for index investing to ordinary readers. The argument is that share price movements are close enough to unpredictable that the effort spent forecasting them is better spent on the things an investor controls: cost, diversification and holding period.

He is the Chemical Bank Chairman’s Professor of Economics, Emeritus, at Princeton University, and served as dean of the Yale School of Management. He was a member of the Council of Economic Advisers in the mid-1970s and spent many years as a director of the Vanguard Group, which placed him close to the practical growth of index funds as well as the theory behind them.

The book has been revised repeatedly across five decades, which is unusual and informative: each edition has had to address whatever new approach was claimed to beat the market in the intervening years. Malkiel has generally conceded that markets are not perfectly efficient while maintaining that they are efficient enough to make persistent outperformance difficult after costs.

Career timeline

  1. 1932
    Born in Boston, Massachusetts.
  2. 1964
    Completes a PhD in economics at Princeton University.
  3. 1973
    Publishes the first edition of A Random Walk Down Wall Street.
  4. 1975
    Appointed to the Council of Economic Advisers.
  5. 1981
    Becomes dean of the Yale School of Management.
  6. 1988
    Returns to Princeton University.
  7. 2012
    Becomes chief investment officer of Wealthfront.

His approach to markets

Malkiel’s position is not that markets are perfect. It is that they are competitive enough that new information is reflected quickly, and that this makes reliable forecasting hard enough to be a poor use of an ordinary investor’s effort. The random walk metaphor describes the difficulty of prediction rather than a claim that prices are meaningless.

From that follows a focus on what is controllable. An investor cannot reliably control returns, but can control costs, the breadth of diversification, the tax treatment of the account, and whether they stay invested. Malkiel’s recommendations have consistently concentrated on those levers rather than on selection.

He has engaged seriously with the anomalies literature over successive editions rather than dismissing it, conceding documented patterns while arguing that they tend to shrink once trading costs and the difficulty of implementation are included.

Key ideas

Tap any idea to expand a plain-English explanation, why it matters, and where to learn more.

Prices are hard to forecast

Price movements incorporate available information quickly enough that future moves are close to unpredictable from past ones.

Why it matters

If forecasting is unreliable, the effort spent on it has a poor expected payoff compared with reducing cost.

Example

The book’s well-known image is that a blindfolded selection could perform comparably to expert picks, which is a claim about the difficulty of forecasting.

Cost is the reliable lever

Fees are certain and compound against the investor, while outperformance is uncertain.

Why it matters

It reframes fund selection around something knowable in advance rather than around past performance.

Example

A difference of one percentage point in annual cost compounds into a large difference over a multi-decade holding period.

Broad diversification as a default

Holding the whole market removes the need to identify which parts of it will do well.

Why it matters

It converts an unanswerable forecasting question into a straightforward allocation decision.

Example

A total market index fund holds the winners without requiring that they be identified in advance.

Rebalancing over prediction

Periodically restoring target weights imposes discipline without requiring any view about the future.

Why it matters

It provides a rule for acting during volatile periods, when discretionary decisions tend to be worst.

Example

Restoring a target mix after a sharp move requires no forecast, only a rule agreed in advance.

Major contributions

  • Wrote A Random Walk Down Wall Street, the most widely read popular case for index investing.
  • Brought the random walk hypothesis and efficient markets research to a general readership.
  • Served for many years as a director of the Vanguard Group during the growth of index funds.
  • Engaged with the anomalies literature across successive editions rather than dismissing it.
  • Served on the Council of Economic Advisers and as dean of the Yale School of Management.

Major successes

  • Published A Random Walk Down Wall Street in 1973, which has remained in print through repeated revised editions for five decades.
  • Served as a director of the Vanguard Group across a period in which index funds moved from novelty to default.
  • Appointed to the Council of Economic Advisers in 1975.
  • Served as dean of the Yale School of Management from 1981 to 1988.
  • Became chief investment officer of Wealthfront, applying the approach in an automated advice setting.

Important books

  • A Random Walk Down Wall Street1973

    The popular case that price movements are hard to forecast and that cost and diversification are the reliable levers. Revised across many later editions.

  • The Elements of Investing

    A short book written with Charles Ellis distilling the argument into a small number of practical principles.

Influence on investors

A Random Walk Down Wall Street is the book most often credited with persuading individual investors to hold index funds, and it reached an audience that the underlying academic literature never would have.

Malkiel and Charles Ellis arrived at similar practical conclusions from different starting points, one from efficient markets research and one from studying institutional performance, and their jointly written short book reflects that convergence.

Criticisms and debates

A balanced view includes the main criticisms and open debates, presented neutrally.

  • Critics argue the efficient markets framing understates how far prices can move from any reasonable assessment of value, pointing to episodes such as the late 1990s technology boom.
  • Behavioural researchers contend that documented and persistent investor biases sit awkwardly with the assumption that prices reflect information rationally.
  • The random walk description has been challenged by evidence of momentum and long-horizon mean reversion in returns.
  • Some argue that the growth of index investing itself raises questions about price discovery that the original framework did not have to address.
  • The advice is aimed at long-horizon investors and does not address the situation of someone who may need the money during a severe drawdown.

Lessons for investors

Plain-English takeaways. Context for learning, not advice to buy or sell anything.

  • 1Focus on cost, diversification and holding period, because those are the parts you actually control.
  • 2Treat past fund performance as weak evidence about future performance, and fees as strong evidence about future drag.
  • 3Use a rebalancing rule so that volatile periods do not require a fresh forecast.
  • 4Expect to encounter a persuasive new approach every few years, and judge it after costs.

Notable quotes

“A blindfolded monkey throwing darts at a newspaper's financial pages could select a portfolio that would do just as well as one carefully selected by experts.”

Sourced: A Random Walk Down Wall Street, 1973

“Investing is not nearly as difficult as it looks. Successful investing involves doing a few things right and avoiding serious mistakes.”

Sourced: A Random Walk Down Wall Street
See Burton Malkiel in the quote library

Frequently asked questions

Who is Burton Malkiel?

Burton Malkiel is an American economist born in 1932, emeritus professor at Princeton University, and the author of A Random Walk Down Wall Street, first published in 1973.

What does a random walk mean here?

It describes price movements that are close to unpredictable from past movements, because new information is incorporated quickly. It is a statement about the difficulty of forecasting rather than about prices being arbitrary.

What is the main argument of the book?

That because reliable forecasting is difficult, investors are generally better served by concentrating on what they control: low costs, broad diversification and a long holding period.

Does Malkiel think markets are perfectly efficient?

No. He has acknowledged documented anomalies and periods of clear mispricing, while arguing that markets are competitive enough that consistently exploiting them after costs is difficult.

How is he connected to index funds?

He made the popular case for them in print and served for many years as a director of the Vanguard Group, so he was close to both the argument and its practical implementation.

What are the main criticisms of his position?

That efficient markets understate how far prices can detach from value, that behavioural evidence sits awkwardly with rational pricing, and that documented momentum effects challenge a strict random walk description.

Related quotes

Other people in the library writing on the same themes.

Strategies Burton Malkiel is associated with

How the money actually gets run, with the mechanics, the costs and the failure modes set out in full.

Related guides

Related concepts

Related tools

Related people

Money Masters OS

Build your investing system

Turn what you are learning into a repeatable process for researching investments, setting your rules, building your portfolio, and navigating markets.

Explore Money Masters OS
Free newsletter

Get smarter about investing

Clear market insights, useful tools, and beginner-friendly investing education.

Two short emails a week. Free.

Educational content only. This is a neutral summary compiled for learning. It is not an endorsement, not investment advice, and not a claim that this person is always right. Mentioning someone here does not imply they are affiliated with Money Masters Media.